Speech on Capital Punishment
Capital punishment is a very controversial issue and it is widely discussed in the modern world. The supporters of death penalty argue that the presence of such a type of retributive justice would prevent other people from committing a crime. As for the opponents, they think it is immoral to take away someone’s life, even if he or she is an offender. I think that there is no place for capital punishment in the civilized community and it should be abolished worldwide.
Making mistakes is in human’s nature, and unfortunately, sometimes the mistakes are of a huge scale. Punishing for a crime was established since the first settlements inhabited the Earth. Nowadays, every country has its laws and rules as well as different types of retributive justice. Death penalty, as the most severe type of punishment, does not exist all over the globe. Those countries that accept it can use it for rape, murder, adultery, or kidnapping etc. Some countries have this type of execution for drug dealers, for example, China, Egypt, Thailand, and Cuba. It is notable that capital punishment receives support in countries with a high crime rate, and accordingly has less approval in countries with a lower crime rate. It is rational and fair that the one who broke the law should receive proper punishment, but at the same time, he or she has a right to live, and capital punishment negates this rule. Moreover, it lowers the value of a human life and degrades society. Death penalty has an irreversible effect and petrifies by its cruelty.
Death penalty is immoral from many perspectives. In the case of such a conviction, many people would be involved in it. As a result, many other individuals will have a feeling of guilt for conducting the most severe type of retributive justice because death penalty is also a murder. So, the question is what murder is less immoral- committed by a criminal, by the person who prescribed the conviction, or who performs it. The answer is that taking away someone’s life is unethical from all perspectives. It is only revenge because it does not either save or returns other lives. In addition, nobody learns a lesson from an execution. On the contrary, it makes other offenders feel even bigger anger and ferocity. Instead of evoking a feeling of fear among lawbreakers, it causes a desire to confront.
Obviously, the negative effect upon society by carrying out executions is large. For example, criminals sometimes organize events, which children can also attend. They encourage the young generation to commit various violations and involve them in criminal situations. Thus, it is not surprising that nowadays to see a teenager on trial is more likely than it was a couple of decades ago. So, in order to promote kindness, it is beneficial to show that modern society is compassionate and does not distribute evil and hatred among its citizens. The most valuable lesson that the society can teach future generations is that kindness cures better than affliction. Undoubtedly, the future is in the hands of younger ones, and so is peace and harmony of a country.
Many wrongly accused people lose their lives because of mistakes in the justice system. Statistics shows that a substantial number of innocent individuals are wrongfully convicted in practically any country. In the case of their innocence is proved, they will be free, unlike the ones who were convicted to death and killed shortly.
In addition, capital punishment is a failure as a deterrent to crime. There is no credible information to prove that death penalty prevents others from committing a crime. It is just an assumption, which the supporters of capital punishment use as an argument. It is important to admit that in the USA, more murders happen in those states where capital punishment is allowed than in those where it is abolished. So, it means that death penalty is an ineffective deterrent and it would be beneficial to implement another choice that would really help to reduce criminality. For instance, rehabilitation programs are much more efficient. In fact, various specially educated professionals such as psychologists and criminologists can help lawbreakers to change their thoughts to the right direction. At least, they can try and no one’s life will be wasted.
Such barbaric type of punishment has no place in the modern world and should be substituted by a more civilized retribution. For example, there is an option to implement life imprisonment for major crimes. In fact, imprisonment enables a perpetrator to think about his or her actions and regret about offense. By giving such a chance to the offender, society shows that killing for a murder cannot be a moral standard. Furthermore, it is possible to offer imprisoned criminals some kind of work in jail. In such a way, a country may have labor free of charge. This fact refutes the idea that it costs more for a country to keep offenders alive during their lifetime than send them to death.
It is important to understand that death penalty is an inefficient type of retributive justice because it is economically ineffective and does not deter crimes. From many perspectives, it should be replaced with life imprisonment because this option is less expensive and much safer. Obviously, it is impossible to expect kindness out of hate, so nothing good can appear from capital punishment.
About author
Sabina work as a writer at https://place-4-papers.com/nursing-essay-writing-service/ She likes this activity because Sabina can use her creative abilities and at the same time learn a lot of new information, improve her skills, receive a nice financial reward. She has considerable experience in writing scientific and artistic works. She has worked with different clients, so she knows how to find a common language with everyone.